JFK was NOT Murdered Because of Executive Order 11110.

Much has been written and circulated on Youtube that JFK was murdered by the Banksters because he issued Executive Order 11110 on 6/4/63. The conspiracy theorists theorize that JFK intended to reign in the powers of the Federal Reserve with the signing of EO 11110. This premise is absolutely not true. The real truth of EO 11110 is clearly documented by G. Edward Griffin in his extraordinary masterpiece on the Federal Reserve and central banks titled The Creature From Jekyll Island, a must read book for students of the Federal Reserve and central banking. Griffin writes:

“In 1981, a rumor was circulated that President Kennedy had been assassinated by agents of the hidden money power because he had signed Executive Order #11110 instructing the Treasury to print more than $4 billion in United States Notes…According to the rumor, the bankers were furious because they would lose interest payments on the money supply. When the Order was tracked down, however, it involved Silver certificates, not United States Notes…But there is no interest paid on Silver Certificates either, so the rumor held up on that point. There was a third point, however, which everyone seemed to overlook. The Executive Order did not instruct the Treasury to issue Silver Certificates. It merely authorized it to do so if the occasion should arise. The occasion never arose. The last issuance of Silver Certificates was in 1957, and that was six years before the Kennedy executive order. In 1987, the order was rescinded by Executive Order 12608 signed by President Reagan.

The government did print some U.S. Notes in 1963, but these were in response to an 1868 act of Congress which directed the Treasury to maintain the amount of U.S. Notes outstanding at a fixed level. That required worn or damaged specimens of older Notes to be replaced by new ones. Some of these new Notes did get into circulation but were quickly snapped up by private collectors. They never became a significant part of the money supply and were not intended to. This printing was not ordered by JFK and, in fact, there was no reason for him even to have had knowledge of it”.

Griffin goes on to document that JFK was a Fabian socialist educated at the London School of Economics who indeed advocated for socialism and the redistribution of weath. In an address at the annual meeting of the IMF/World Bank, JFK said:

“Twenty years ago, when the architects of these institutions met to design an international banking structure….Sixty per cent of the gold reserves of the world were here in the United States…There was a need for redistribution of the financial resources of the world…And there was an equal need to organize a flow of capital to the impoverished countries of the world. All this has come about. It did not come about by chance but by conscious and deliberate and responsible planning”. (Page 109 in The Creature).

What is crystal clear is that JFK absolute did endorse central banks and their sister organizations (IMF and World Bank) for the sole purpose of redistributing wealth. Wealth is never redistributed from the wealthy to the poor; it’s always redistributed from the poor and middle class to the wealthy. That’s the primary purpose of central banks – to make the rich ruling families richer and to concentrate all wealth and power at the expense of liberty and free markets for the masses. What meager distribution of wealth to the poor that does occur in the name of socialism is always a few crumbs that are tossed to the masses in a phony display of compassion. It’s more like a vision of feudal overlords feasting at the table and then tossing the bones and crumbs at the skeletal and impoverished serfs.

Personally, I greatly admire JFK on several issues, especially his abhorrence of war and the military industrial complex. Moreover, I highly recommend the book “JFK and the Unspeakable, Why He Died and Why it Matters” by James Douglass. Douglass does an outstanding job of meticulously documenting his murder and the deadly foreign policy of empire that is a disease eating away at American liberty and prosperity. What is true is that JFK was murdered in a coup d’etat and Douglass says “We have no evidence as to who in the military-industrial complex may have given the order to assassinate President Kennedy. That the order was carried out by the Central Intelligence Agency is obvious. The CIA’s fingerprints are all over the crime and the events leading up to it.”

Finally, any study of JFK’s presidency discloses that he was faced with one crisis after another – the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam and domestic issues like civil rights. Monetary policy and the Federal Reserve were definitely not on the agenda or even an issue of concern except in the context of endorsing global governance institutions like the UN, IMF and World Bank and their totalitarian agendas.

Although the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 enabled wars and government power grabs, the fact that the dollar was pegged to gold functioned as a restraint on ‘Banksters and Government Gone Wild”. It took an Executive Order signed by Republican Richard Nixon in 1971 to de-tether the dollar from gold and permanently render it a worthless fiat paper currency 8 years after JFK’s murder.

It was Nixon who delivered the death blow to the dollar. It’s probably true that JFK would have done the same thing.

World War I, the Banksters, the Lusitania and Bailing Out America’s Wealthiest Families

Few folks understand the link between Banksters and wars, largely because naïve Americans can’t bear the thought that they’ve been duped and lied to by the media and the government. Even worse, the thought that their loved ones died in foreign wars for nothing more than defense contractor and Bankster profits is a brutal truth that’s like a dagger straight through their souls – it’s so damn painful that they refuse to believe it. It’s an ongoing problem.

The primary information source for this post is Chapter 12 from The Creature From Jekyll Island (The Creature) by G. Edward Griffin titled “Sink the Lusitania”. It’s just another fascinating chapter in The Creature that documents the role of the Banksters and central banks in murderous wars and the events leading up to the wars. Griffin states “American schoolchildren are taught that Uncle Sam came into the war “to make the world safe for democracy”. Forget that democracy is unlimited majority mob rule where 51% of the people get to squash the rights of the other 49% at the ballot box. Our founders greatly feared democracy as a form of government and for obviously sane reasons. More to the point, it was no accident that WW I was started in 1914 following the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913.

England and France borrowed heavily from the Banksters to fund World War I. But the Bankster were involved in far more than the business of loaning money; they also had a cut of damn near everything associated with the war machine and the House of Morgan was the principle US banking player. War materials are a huge business and the House of Morgan seemed to procure monopolies as shipping agents and purchasing agents for just about every possible accoutrement of war. The House of Morgan had contracts with Great Britain that “would eventually climb to an astronomical $3 billion. The firm became the largest consumer on earth, spending up to $10 million per day….Each month, Morgan presided over purchases which were equal to the gross national product of the entire world just one generation before.” The House of Morgan was also heavily invested with funding the French government’s substantial role in WW I.

How big were Morgan’s WW I profits? The Creature goes on to state “It is estimated that in the course of the war some 2000 million [2 billion] dollars passed in this way through Morgan’s hands.” Being a direct lender and having subsidiaries to earn a cut of all things associated with war commerce is, by far, the most profitable venture in all of human history.

But where the story gets really interesting is when WW I was going badly for France and England because of the German U-boats that managed to sink between 1914 and 1918 over 5,700 ships loaded with critical food supplies and war materials. The situation became so desperate that England and France were seriously considering suing Germany for peace. Such a situation would have resulted in massive investor losses. The Creature states:

“The Morgan group had floated one-and-a-half billion dollars in loans to Britain and France. With the fortunes of war turning against them, investors were facing the threat of a total loss. As Ferdinand Lundberg observed: “The declaration of war by the United States, in addition to extricating the wealthiest American families from a dangerous situation, also opened new vistas of profits”.”

It couldn’t be more clear – war is always about money, bailing out the wealthy and the prospect of more profits from more and more war.

President Woodrow Wilson, a progressive Democrat who dreamed of one world socialist government, was also heavily connected to Wall Street. In fact, it can be stated that Wall Street owned Wilson. Wilson also claimed to be a pacifist and Griffin offers clarity on Wilson’s alleged pacifism “It is probably true that Wilson was a pacifist at heart, but it is equally certain that he was not entirely the master of his own destiny. He was a transplanted college professor from the ivy-covered walls of Princeton, an internationalist at heart who dreamed of helping to create a world government and to usher in a millennium of peace…he was all but powerless to act on his own..”

For all Wilson’s self-righteous claims as a pacifist and humanitarian, he had no problem whatsoever participating in the sinking of the Lusitania and sending 1,195 folks, including 195 Americans, to their ocean graves. Despite Wall Street buying up major newspapers and installing their own editorial staffs and journalists to promote America’s entry in WW I, the American people were still not buying into American involvement in WW I which they believed to be a European problem and certain not their problem.

The Lusitania was built to look like a passenger ship but it was also built to specifications of the British Admiralty as documented by Griffin “Everything from the horsepower of her engines and the shape of her hull to the placement of ammunition storage areas were, in fact, military designs. She was built specifically to carry twelve six-inch guns. The construction costs for these features were paid for by the British government”. The Lusitania was owned by the Cunard Company. Why the Lusitania? Cunard wasn’t owned by Morgan who failed in his attempt to buy it.

One of the most revered men in western history, Winston Churchill, also happens to be one of the most evil. He was aware that the Lusitania had been selected to sail into U-boat infested waters without escorts for the sole purpose of being sunk. Churchill even “issued orders that British merchant ships must no longer obey a U-boat order to halt and be searched. If they had armament, they were to engage the enemy. If they did not, they were to attempt to ram the sub. The immediate result of this change was to force German U-boats to remain submerged for protection and to simply sink the ships without warning”.

Shockingly, the Germans knew that the Lusitania was loaded with war materials and that the US and Britain were setting up a passenger ship to be sunk. The German Embassy in Washington protested to the US State Department who not only ignored the German communication but the State Department refused to issue warning to passengers despite knowing that they would be die. The German Embassy went even further and attempted to takeout full page ads in major newspapers warning Americans that the Lusitania was in grave danger of being sunk. The State Department intervened and blocked newspapers from running the ads.

Needless to say there was much silent celebration in the US, Britain and on Wall Street when the Lusitania was sunk by a U-boat on 5/7/1915. War fever finally gripped Americans and their outrage was expected. The propaganda coup and the Lusitania cover-up paid off splendidly for the US government, Britain and the Banksters. Griffin writes “The purpose…would have been better served had an American ship been sunk by the Germans but a British ship with 195 Americans downed was sufficient to do the job. The players wasted no time in whipping up public sentiment.”

Nearly 1200 drowned folks were inconsequential casualties for the war profiteering Banksters and the US government. WW I raged between 1914 and 1918 and resulted in 10-12 million deaths, the low end of the estimate. Wikipedia estimates 15 million deaths and 20 million wounded. However, the most interesting aspect of all this murderous carnage is that the Federal Reserve was created in 1913 specifically to facilitate perpetual wars, starting with WW I, and to create the biggest wealth transfer in human history – from the poor and middle class to the rich, and all in a very deadly and bloody fashion.

The real purpose of WW I, the Federal Reserve and America’s entry into WW I? Griffin nails it “Congress dutifully passed the War Loan Act which extended $1 billion in credit to the Allies. The first advance of $200 million went to the British the next day and was immediately applied as payment on the debt to Morgan….Within three months the British had run up their overdraft with Morgan to $400 million dollars, and the firm presented it to the government for payment…. “The Wilson Administration found itself in an extremely awkward position, having to bail out J.P. Morgan” wrote Ferrell, but Benjamin Strong “offered to help…” “…in 1917-18, the Treasury quietly paid Morgan piecemeal for the overdraft”. By the time the war was over, the Treasury had lent a total of $9,466,000 including $2,170,000 given after the Armistice. That was the cash flow they had long awaited. In addition to saving the Morgan loans, even larger profits were to be made from war production. The government had been secretly preparing for war for six months prior to the actual declaration”.

Griffin’s 26 page chapter is meticulously documented with a whole lot more of the gory details surrounding J.P. Morgan, the US government and WW I but the bottom line is perfectly clear – WW I was a Bankster initiative. The Lusitania tragedy is a classic example of what is called a false flag attack or how a government engineers an event specifically designed to garner populist outrage and the beating of the war drums by the people. False flag attacks are very common and very effective propaganda coups.

Peace activists of all political stripes should be asking themselves this: without central banks how could governments wage horrific warfare? The answer is they can’t and without war debt bailouts from government central banks the Banksters would never assume such risks. In the case of WW I, the Banksters never would have risked their own money but the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 guaranteed that the Banksters would be paid out of the public treasury regardless of the outcome of Bankster war gambling. Bankster don’t care who wins the war, they only care about getting paid and making themselves richer.

The Romney/Paul Buzz – What’s it all about?

There is definitely a ton of buzz on the Romney/Paul relationship and it’s unnerving some folks. Romney and Ron Paul go back to 2008 when they met on the campaign trail. Their wives became friends. When Ron Paul’s plane broke down, the Romney’s offered Ron Paul their plane and their home (Ron Paul thanked the Romney’s but refused the offer).

Who is Mitt Romney? I believe that Romney is a closeted Paulite of sorts who has far more in common with Ron Paul than he does with either Sanitorium and Gingrich. As late as 6/11, Romney was testing the campaign trail waters by saying that maybe we shouldn't be the policeman of the world. He immediately got pummeled by Fox and the neocons. They don't trust Romney. Then Romney started ratcheting up the neocon rhetoric to strengthen his weak neocon credentials. They still didn’t believe him and are convinced that he's a Paulite in an elephant suit. Romney was never a classic DC insider like Gingrich and Sanitorium - he's just a guy who spent most of his life as a businessman and had one term as governor of Mass. In a political arena dominated by vetted insiders, guys like Romney and Ron Paul are not trusted because aren’t players or even party loyalists.

What are Romney’s strengths? Romney is a very smart man and an extraordinarily competent problem solver. He took over failed companies headed into bankruptcy and saved them. When the Olympics were in deep trouble, it was Romney who cleaned up the mess and restored credibility to the Olympics. As governor of Massachusetts, he walked into the mess known as The Big Dig, a Ted Kennedy ‘underground tunnel through downtown Boston’ project that was supposed to cost $2 billion but ended bilking state and federal taxpayers out of at least $15 billion. The Big Dig leaked like sieve and a woman was killed driving to work when a huge chunk of concrete fell and crushed her to death in her vehicle. Romney rolled up his sleeves and stepped into engineering mode, he fired people and he solved The Big Dig structural problems at minimal taxpayer costs.

Among other Romney attributes is his ability to make a decisive decision. After getting pummeled by Gingrich in the SC debate and losing badly, Romney immediately recognized that he was failing in the debates. That night he researched debate coaches and rang up Michelle Bachmann’s debate coach who is considered one of the best debate coaches in the country. The next morning the guy was in Florida as Romney’s new debate coach. Again, this is classic Romney recognizing a problem and solving the problem.

That’s really what Romney does best – he solves big problems. On the negative side, it’s true that some of the companies Romney saved ended with government subsidies and bailouts. It’s also true that Romney is heavily funded by Wall Street which of course raises the issue of whether or not Romney would ever support Audit the Fed or the restoration of sound money. The monetary system is a hugely critical issue for Paulites and liberty activists. Romney has failed to earn the trust of the Paulites.

The Evangelical GOP base is very hostile to Romney because he's a Mormon. Rick Perry publicly said that Mormonism is a cult. But the Evangelicals who diss the Pope as the whore of Babylon and the anti-Christ are now stuck with two Papists - Santorum and Gingrich. They aren’t happy about it but the theocons and neocons will take a statist militaristic Papist any day over a Mormon they neither like nor trust.

The Romney campaign wisely made the decision early on not to make enemies with the Paulites because they were smart enough to figure out that Ron Paul will own a bag of delegates and that Ron Paul owns the youth vote. Ron Paul also polls very well with the Independent voters.

I believe that Romney genuinely admires and respects Ron Paul on many levels which is why Romney never attacks Ron Paul. Of course, I do believe that Ron Paul also admires and respects Romney on some level. For intellectual candidates like Romney and Ron Paul it’s all about knocking out the flame throwers Gingrich and Santorum who they both perceive as very dangerous. Gingrich and Santorum manage to capitalize on driving the raw emotions of the Republican base. While such tactics are routine in politics, Romney and Ron Paul are very uncomfortable with whipping folks into an emotional frenzy. Romney and Ron Paul are more like mild mannered college professors while Gingrich and Santorum are more like panting preachers raging from the pulpit.

Would I vote for Romney in a general election? Not unless a Ron Paul approved running mate or somebody with the name of Paul was on the ticket. A Romney nomination and the potential for a Paulite on the ticket is what is really terrorizing the neocons and the GOP elites. Also, Romney knows that he can't win without the Independent vote, the youth vote and the Paulite/Libertarian vote. Romney didn’t come this far in his relentless pursuit to become president to lose in a general election.

A Modest Proposal

Crown the Angry Little Lunar Attack Muffin Emperor of the Moon. Elect Romney President of any planet except earth. Send Sanitorium the Sanctimonious on a journey through Dante's Nine Circles of Hell and leave the earth to the only earthling in the race.

From the Oophs Campaign to the guy who managed to moon himself right out of the race, the GOP primary has evolved into a most entertaining reality show and one with lots of road kill to appease a Republican base hungry for a ‘kill em’ orgasm as they cheer murder and genocide. Shockingly or not so shockingly, Republicans have even nullified the Golden Rule which was greeted with loud jeers when mentioned by Ron Paul. The cheers and jeers speak a telling but horrifying truth about the rancid soul of the GOP and its vociferous base.

Of course, the dastardly Trotsksyite totalitarian Dems are no better. Heck, it was the Dems, progressives and liberals who bought us WW I, WW II, the Korean War, Vietnam and the Balkan Wars. I haven’t calculated the death tolls from those adventures to liberate humanity by invoking massive genocide.

Having stopped voting Republican in 2006 after witnessing the GOP churn itself into the Nazi Party replete with endless wars, statism on steroids, the wholesale evisceration of the civil liberties, the massive concentration of Fedzilla powers and fascist corporatism, liberation from political parties freed me to become an independent voter. There is only one candidate advocating for my agenda of peace, liberty and prosperity and that’s Ron Paul, an earthling of uncompromising morality and justice – the only candidate who teaches that liberty absolutely does required natural rights for all people and minimalist state powers.

If we are witnessing anything it’s probably the permanent demise of the Republican Party, an organization so repugnant and vile that its death should be a welcome sigh of relief for a tortured humanity facing the constant horrors of endless missiles, invasions, occupations, bombs and drones. Ditto for the Democrat Party!

Jonathan Swift’s famous essay titled “a Modest Proposal”, a satirical proposal advocating that Irish babies should be eaten by the elites, is no longer satire. It’s a stark reality but one where human genocide hasn’t quite elevated itself to raw and absolute cannibalism. But in a world suffering under totalitarian tyranny, it won’t be long before humans are forced to consume each other just to survive.

The 7 Deadly Sins and Has the GOP Morphed into the Nazi Party?

The 7 Deadly Sins and Has the GOP Morphed into the Nazi Party?

It’s hard being a Libertarian, constitutionalist and a classical liberal. You just don’t fit into the Republican or Democratic Parties because opposing wars and totalitarianism is verboten by state sanctioned parties. But this campaign season the Republicans, except for Ron Paul, have managed the incredible feat of raising the bar in its overt advocacy for endless wars and totalitarian tyranny. Has the GOP morphed into the Nazi Party? It’s a valid question considering the level of shameless verbosity of the neocon theocratic statists that dominate the GOP.

Republican voters love big bad bullies.

Perry said he loves executing folks. The debate crowd cheers.
Somebody attacked gays in the military. The debate crowd cheers.
Somebody said let sick people just die. The debate crowd cheers.

And on and on. Gingrich attacked the media for raising the issue of his now infamous serial adulterer lifestyle. The church going crowd went wild because, well, they love adulterers. During the Fox debate Gingrich talked about just killing our enemies. He got a standing ovation.

Ron Paul talks about invoking the Golden Rule and gets BOOED!

I'm convinced that the GOP base is a gang of murderous psychopaths.

A pundit summarized it best:

“Why do I keep pointing to Gingrich as the obvious GOP nominee? It's certainly not because I prefer him or support him. Even if I voted, and even if I voted Republican, I wouldn't vote for Newt.

But, here's the thing: This is a street fight, and Gingrich is a street fightin' man. There's no attack he won't use if he thinks it will work, and there's no blow he can't absorb standing up. That's how he's going to beat Romney, and that's how he's going to try to beat Obama.

Mitt Romney is the kind of candidate who does quite well, as long as he's floating forward on a carefully crafted narrative of "inevitability."…

Ron Paul is certainly a fighter. If the GOP -- Establishment and rank-and-file alike -- hadn't let themselves get so entrenched and besieged in their crackpipe post-9/11 foreign policy errors, he'd stand a chance. Unfortunately, mistakes of that size and scope tend to self-reinforce; they're so big, ugly and stupid that people can't bring themselves to admit they were mistakes at all. And most of them just won't support a candidate who's urging them to get their heads out of their asses instead of patting them on the back and telling them they're smart.”

Source: http://knappster.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-i-keep-telling-you-to-expect-newt.html

And there, you have it. As Republicans wallow in their delusional grandiosity, they refuse to admit that they grievously erred and opted instead to live a lie and destroy the Republican Party or what’s left of it (not much). In fact, the portly butterball turkey known as the Angry Little Attack Muffin (a phrase coined by WSJ’s Peggy Noonan to describe Gingrich) actually embraced grandiosity as a desirable personal and national characteristic “This is a grandiose country of big people doing big things.” Indeed!

Except for the only truly moral and truly Christian man in the race – Ron Paul, the GOP primary is a case study in the Seven Deadly Sins – Lust, Pride, Gluttony, Sloth, Greed, Anger and Envy. Republicans lust for absolute power (some lust for both power and sex), Republicans are proud of divesting America of constitutional liberty (Patriot Act, NDAA), Republicans have an insatiable and gluttonous appetite for more government and murderous wars, Republicans are too lazy and slothful to defend our Constitution, Republicans are so greedy for the spoils of war and fascism that they routinely renounce free markets and liberty, Republicans burst into anger whenever anyone questions their corporatist, totalitarian, military industrial complex agenda and Republican envy translates into pure resentment for those who advocate for peace, liberty and prosperity.

I will proudly vote for Ron Paul, the only sane candidate in the GOP line-up, but I am also proud to not be a Republican.

Liberty is on a ROLL!

After a solidly strong third in Iowa and a stunning 2nd in NH that left GOP and media elites gasping for air, Ron Paul and his army of liberty activists are mobilizing in SC.

WOW, we've come a long way baby since 2008 when Huckabee crushed Ron Paul in Iowa by 24 points (34% - 10%) and a weak 9% NH finish.

South Carolina, like many southern states, is the belly of the neocon-theocon beast and Ron Paul is so ready to dive right in with his awesome message of peace, liberty and prosperity. In a state dominated by lovers of big government and endless wars, South Carolina is our biggest challenge yet, as will be the rest of the south. It's critically important that Ron Paul does very well and well enough to propel him to top finishes throughout the rest of the south.

The polls are indicating that Ron Paul is surging in SC and that's awesome news. The Republican Primary has been one hell of a reality/commedy show with characters like the Angry Little Attack Muffin (Gingrich), the Oophs Candidate (Perry), Sanitorium (a socially intolerant madman), Bat Shit Crazy Bachmann (even too crazy for crazy Republicans) and the Hermanator 999 (a number possibly derived from the number of pending adultery scandals of Mr. Cain), it's looking like it's down to Mittens and Ron Paul.

America is in deep dodo and the only cure is the medicine offered by Dr. Paul. If we fail to take the medicine, America will descend into a totalitarian statist hell and our future will be grim.

The Great Duck Dinner

Chapter 23 of The Creature From Jekyll Island (The Creature) is titled The Great Duck Dinner. If Americans want to understand what has gone wrong in America, look no further than Griffin's incredible parable about the Great Duck Dinner.

Are human indistinguishable from ducks? Our actions say yes. Our masters say yes. If we are ducks it's because we choose to be ducks.

Excerpted from The Creature

The story is told of a New England farmer with a small pond in his pasture. Each summer, a group of wild ducks would frequent that pond but, try as he would, the farmer could never catch one. No matter how early in the morning he approached, or how carefully he constructed a blind, or what kind of duck call he tried, somehow those crafty birds sensed the danger and managed to be out of range. Of course, when fall arrived, the ducks headed South, and the farmer’s craving for a duck dinner only intensified.

Then he got an idea. Early in the spring, he started scattering corn along the edge of the pond. The ducks liked the corn and, since it was always there, they soon gave up dipping and foraging for food of their own. After a while, they became used to the farmer and began to trust him. They could see he was their benefactor and they now walked close to him with no sense of fear. Life was so easy, they forgot how to fly. But that was unimportant, because they were now so fat they couldn’t have gotten off the water even if they had tried.

Fall came, and the ducks stayed. Winter came and the pond froze. The farmer built a shelter to keep them warm. The ducks were happy because they didn’t have to fly. And the farmer was especially happy because, each week all winter long, he had a delicious duck dinner.